On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 09:37:00 -0700 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/07/16 00:52, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20160906: > > > > on i386: > > ../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c: In function 'get_sample': > ../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:258:18: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member named 'max_latency' > if (sample > tr->max_latency) > ^ > ../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:259:6: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member named 'max_latency' > tr->max_latency = sample; > ^ > ../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c: In function 'hwlat_tracer_init': > ../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:583:4: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member named 'max_latency' > tr->max_latency = 0; > ^ > > when CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE is not enabled. > Thanks! Below is the fix. I'll have to add it. -- Steve diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig index 72c07c2ffd79..d9000a81960e 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ config SCHED_TRACER config HWLAT_TRACER bool "Tracer to detect hardware latencies (like SMIs)" select GENERIC_TRACER + select TRACER_MAX_TRACE help This tracer, when enabled will create one or more kernel threads, depening on what the cpumask file is set to, which each thread -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
