On Thursday, August 4, 2016 11:54:18 PM CEST Nicholas Piggin wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:31:39 +1000 > Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 04 Aug 2016 14:09:02 +0200 > > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Nicolas Pitre has done some related work, adding him to Cc. IIRC we have > > > actually had multiple implementations of -ffunction-sections/--gc-sections > > > in the past that people have used in production, but none of them > > > ever made it upstream. > > After some googling around it seems lto has been difficult to > get in and it was agreed this gc-sections should be done first > anyway (although it may indeed provide a superset of DCE, but > it's always going to be more costly and complicated). Lto would > have the same issue with liveness of entry points, which is > really the only thing you need change in the kernel as far as I > can see. Ok, good. > I didn't really see what problems people were having with it > though, so maybe it's architecture specific or something I > haven't run into yet. I remember trying it a few years ago without success, it's possible that old binutils versions were more problematic. I'm happy to test your patches on ARM, with my randconfig builder I tend to find obscure bugs in corner cases that you might not normally find with just defconfig/allmodconfig builds. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
