On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 04:36:55PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:19:20PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu: > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:37:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:41:18PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf escreveu: > > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 09:23:02AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > It just looks like objtool was not written with cross compilation in > > > > > mind? > > > > > > > I don't know yet what the specific problem is, but objtool should work > > > > fine in a cross-compiled environment. It needs to be compiled with the > > > > host (powerpc) compiler, but then it needs to disassemble target (x86) > > > > files. It worked fine before the bitsperlong.h files were merged. > > > > > > So, trying to summarize from the various messages in this thread: > > > > > > In Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:26:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > It produces these errors (from the x86_64 allmodconfig build): > > > > > > > > In file included from > > > > /home/sfr/next/next/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h:10:0, > > > > from /usr/include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h:11, > > > > from /usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/asm/types.h:27, > > > > from /home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/linux/types.h:9, > > > > from /home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/linux/list.h:4, > > > > from elf.h:23, > > > > from elf.c:30: > > > > /home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/asm-generic/bitsperlong.h:13:2: > > > > error: #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h > > > > #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h > > > > ^ > > > > > > So it starts at tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h, and as > > > you mention, this should've instead be using the host headers, i.e.: > > > > > > tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h > > > > > > Which it will if it uses HOSTARCH in tools/objtool/Makefile when setting > > > up the header search path, I have two csets in my perf/core branch that > > > fixes this, and that are equivalent to the last patch Stephen tried: > > > > > > $ git log --oneline -2 > > > 87f7dc54366a objtool: Use tools/scripts/Makefile.arch to get ARCH and HOSTARCH > > > 0eec6770ab60 tools build: Add HOSTARCH Makefile variable > > > $ > > > > > > Ok, so now it uses the right file, see the whole sequence at the end of this > > > e-mail, but it boils down to: > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > #if defined(__powerpc64__) > > > # define __BITS_PER_LONG 64 > > > #else > > > # define __BITS_PER_LONG 32 > > > #endif > > > > > > #ifdef __SIZEOF_LONG__ > > > #define BITS_PER_LONG (__CHAR_BIT__ * __SIZEOF_LONG__) > > > #else > > > #define BITS_PER_LONG __WORDSIZE > > > #endif > > > > > > #if BITS_PER_LONG != __BITS_PER_LONG > > > #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h > > > #endif > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Which I think has no problems, right? The last problem reported ty Stephen now is: > > > > > > In Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:23:02 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > That gets me this errors from the x86_64 allmodconfig build: > > > > > > > tools/objtool/objtool-in.o: In function `decode_instructions': > > > > tools/objtool/builtin-check.c:276: undefined reference to `arch_decode_instruction' > > > > > > Should work, since ARCH should be x86 and then tools/objtool/Build will have > > > this: > > > > > > objtool-y += arch/$(ARCH)/ > > > > > > Turned into: > > > > > > objtool-y += arch/x86/ > > > > > > Which will build tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c, that will provide that > > > arch_decode_instruction() function :-\ > > > > > > I.e. with the two patches I mentioned, that are equivalent to the last patch I > > > sent to Stephen for testing, we would end up with HOSTARCH=powerpc and > > > ARCH=x86, no? > > > > Thanks for spelling it out, that helped a lot. > > Glad you liked it, I had to do it for my own sanity :-) > > And something that gave me mixed feelings was an e-mail from the kbuild > test bot that noticed my perf/core changes and said that the build was > broken for "make ARCH=x86_64", so I had to reinstate this part: > > ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64) > ARCH := x86 > endif > > Because, as you say, 'make ARCH=x86' works :-\ I think it will not be > needed with your patch, right? I'm checking your patch below right now, Yeah, that shouldn't be needed with my patch. I think either would work, but my patch is more of a permanent solution. -- Josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
