Em Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 05:29:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:24:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Seems ok, but I'll reinstate this: > > > > #if BITS_PER_LONG != __BITS_PER_LONG > > #error Inconsistent word size. Check asm/bitsperlong.h > > #endif > > Confuses me; why do we have two? > > Why not then do: > > #define BITS_PER_LONG __BITS_PER_LONG > > and be done with it? Well, I just kept existing kernel practice, it uses __BITS_PER_LONG in uapi files and BITS_PER_LONG elsewhere, since we copy stuff from the kernel and check when it drifts using diff, I kept it like that so that automation could point us when the tools/ copy drifted from the original file. - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
