* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c > > between commit: > > 255303026193 ("x86: apply more __ro_after_init and const") > > from the kspp tree and commit: Kees, did you plan to submit this patch (and any other pending x86 patches) to the x86 tree? > > 1bf8915ae515 ("x86/tsc: Enumerate SKL cpu_khz and tsc_khz via CPUID") > > from the tip tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. Looks good to me! Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html