Hi Josh,
On wo, 2016-06-15 at 09:03 -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> I agree it looks like a false positive, though the code is a bit
> convoluted, so I'm not surprised that gcc might get confused.
Agree.
> How about initializing opt to 0?
I'm unconvinced. Especially since this only shows up in 64 bits builds.
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
> static inline int ip_vs_proc_sync_conn(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs, __u8
> - struct ip_vs_sync_conn_options opt;
> + struct ip_vs_sync_conn_options opt = {0};
You forgot to append
/* I give up */
here. More common would be to use
/* silence GCC */
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
