On Fri 10-06-16 14:59:16, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:55:54 +0200 mhocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 2016-06-10 11:50, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > forked from http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=146553910928716&w=2 > > > > > > new_slab()->BUG->die()->exit_signals() can be called from atomic > > > context: local IRQs disabled in slab_alloc(). > > > > I have sent a patch to drop the BUG() from that path today. It > > is just too aggressive way to react to a non-critical bug. > > See > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465548200-11384-2-git-send-email-mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx > > Doesn't this simply mean that Sergey's workload will blurt a pr_warn() > rather than a BUG()? That still needs fixing. Confused. Yes that should be fixed by http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160610074223.GC32285@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx which prevents from using a wrong GFP... -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
