[PATCH] Missing bio_put following submit_bio_wait

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



submit_bio_wait() gives the caller an opportunity to examine
struct bio and so expects the caller to issue the put_bio()

This fixes a memory leak reported by a few people in 4.7-rc2
kmemleak report after 9082e87bfbf8 ("block: remove struct bio_batch")

Signed-off-by: Shaun Tancheff <shaun.tancheff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Larry Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Tested-by: David Drysdale <drysdale@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/blk-lib.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
index 23d7f30..9e29dc3 100644
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 		ret = submit_bio_wait(type, bio);
 		if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
 			ret = 0;
+		bio_put(bio);
 	}
 	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
 
@@ -165,8 +166,10 @@ int blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (bio)
+	if (bio) {
 		ret = submit_bio_wait(REQ_WRITE | REQ_WRITE_SAME, bio);
+		bio_put(bio);
+	}
 	return ret != -EOPNOTSUPP ? ret : 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_write_same);
@@ -206,8 +209,11 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (bio)
-		return submit_bio_wait(WRITE, bio);
+	if (bio) {
+		ret = submit_bio_wait(WRITE, bio);
+		bio_put(bio);
+		return ret;
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.8.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux