Hi Chris, On Wed, 18 May 2016 11:23:57 +0100 Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm pretty sure they didn't exist when I wrote the patch! Yeah, but they do in the drm-misc tree where your patch was applied ... so someone should do a fix patch to be applied to that tree. In the mean time, I will apply the below as a merge fix in linux-next. > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_fb.c > index 33d30c19f35f..147df85399ab 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_fb.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_fb.c > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ struct drm_framebuffer *mtk_drm_mode_fb_create(struct drm_device *dev, > if (drm_format_num_planes(cmd->pixel_format) != 1) > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > - gem = drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file, cmd->handles[0]); > + gem = drm_gem_object_lookup(file, cmd->handles[0]); > if (!gem) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_gem.c > index a773bfaea913..fa2ec0cd00e8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_gem.c > @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ int mtk_drm_gem_dumb_map_offset(struct drm_file *file_priv, > struct drm_gem_object *obj; > int ret; > > - obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(dev, file_priv, handle); > + obj = drm_gem_object_lookup(file_priv, handle); > if (!obj) { > DRM_ERROR("failed to lookup gem object.\n"); > return -EINVAL; -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html