On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:12:34AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 05/17/2016 09:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> [...]
> >Someone's not gonna be happy with commit 6077776b5908 ("bpf: split
> >HAVE_BPF_JIT into cBPF and eBPF variant") breaking the sort order again...
>
> Wasn't aware of that. Maybe I'm missing something, but there appears
> to be no throughout consistent ordering ...
>
> [...]
> select HAVE_PERF_REGS
> select HAVE_PERF_USER_STACK_DUMP
> select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE
> select HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
> select IOMMU_DMA if IOMMU_SUPPORT
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
> select IRQ_FORCED_THREADING
> [...]
> select RTC_LIB
> select SPARSE_IRQ
> select SYSCTL_EXCEPTION_TRACE
> select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
> select HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
> [...]
We keep fixing them as we merge other stuff. For example, latest
mainline has commit 8ee708792e1c ("arm64: Kconfig: remove redundant
HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE definition") which also fixes up the
Kconfig order.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
