On Friday 13 May 2016 17:47:17 Andy Gross wrote: > On 13 May 2016 at 17:19, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri 13 May 14:01 PDT 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > >> On Tuesday 10 May 2016 11:39:34 Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > [..] > >> > I assume we could have the QRTR go through Andy and arm-soc, with > >> > David's approval and this fix squashed in. But we're running rather late > >> > in this cycle, perhaps we should just back the QRTR patches out and I > >> > can respin and resend them after the merge window (for v4.8 instead)? > >> > >> I'd suggest you do a merge of next-next with the qcom/soc-2 branch that > >> we have in arm-soc and resolve the conflict in the merge, then send > >> a pull request with the merge to davem. > >> > > > > Hi David, > > > > In case you missed this thread, linux-next highlighted an upcoming merge > > conflict between the net-next and one of the branches included in the > > arm-soc trees. > > > > I have prepared the merge of net-next and the conflicting tag from the > > Qualcomm SOC, please include this in your pull towards Linus to avoid > > the merge conflict. > > > > Regards, > > Bjorn > > > > The following changes since commit ed7cbbce544856b20e5811de373cf92e92499771: > > > > udp: Resolve NULL pointer dereference over flow-based vxlan device (2016-05-13 01:56:14 -0400) > > > OK. The contents look good to me. > > Acked-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
