On May 06, 2016, 13:03, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This patch was the 3rd in of a set of 3, and the header you added below was
> > added as part of the 2nd patch of that set, hence why it is missing here. I
> > assume the first 2 patches are still being reviewed by Mark.
>
> Yes. The ID patch should have been the first one here, put the simple
> stuff first.
In my mind it makes sense to only add this after support to use it is in place
in the driver, hence the ordering.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
