Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andre,

On 08/03/16 15:52, André Przywara wrote:
On 07/03/16 11:04, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Wim,

Today's linux-next merge of the watchdog tree got a conflict in:

   arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts

between commit:

   d11a89796678 ("arm64: dts: split Foundation model dts to put the GIC separately")

from the arm-soc tree and commit:

   fe3a97e8ed02 ("ARM64: add SBSA Generic Watchdog device node in foundation-v8.dts")

from the watchdog tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

But unfortunately this is the wrong solution. The watchdog DT node
belongs into the (newly created) common foundation-v8.dtsi, not into the
GICv2-only .dts.
So whoever now provides the watchdog patch, can it be rebased on top of
the foundation model .dts rework, so that the new node ends up in the
.dtsi file?
If this is too much hassle I could also send a fix after -rc1 (as the
breakage is not really critical).


I have rebased it on top of my earlier PR and sending it shortly.
I have moved it to dtsi file.

--
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux