On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 07:32:17AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20160223: > > > ... > > The aio tree still had a build failure so I used the version from > > next-20160111. > > > > Might be good to poke the maintainer as I am seeing this for a long > time in Linux-next. These are architecture code related build failures that arch maintainers need to fix. Avoiding pulling the tree allows people to ignore the issue, which isn't going to get things fixed. I provided an example how to implement the 64 bit __get_user() without generating warnings, and it is now up to maintainers to adapt it for their architecture. -ben > - Sedat - -- "Thought is the essence of where you are now." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
