Hi Mark,
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:41:42AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
I'm about to push the following patch on top of the KVM tree:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 43688d9..31fe7d6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -333,11 +333,6 @@ static inline void __cpu_init_hyp_mode(phys_addr_t boot_pgd_ptr,
hyp_stack_ptr, vector_ptr);
}
-static inline void __cpu_init_stage2(void)
-{
- kvm_call_hyp(__init_stage2_translation);
-}
-
static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void) {}
static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
@@ -349,4 +344,11 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+/* #define kvm_call_hyp(f, ...) __kvm_call_hyp(kvm_ksym_ref(f), ##__VA_ARGS__) */
+
+static inline void __cpu_init_stage2(void)
+{
+ kvm_call_hyp(__init_stage2_translation);
+}
+
#endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ */
This will create a new conflict, but will make the resolution 100% clear.
I applied this, but arm64 defconfig wouldn't build until I uncommented
the '#define kvm_call_hyp(...' line.
Is that right?
Thanks,
Brian
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
