Hi Geert, On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:23:48 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That resolution looks correct to me, but doesn't match your end result > in next-20160216: > > u32 set_mux = pctl->desc->irq_read_needs_mux && > test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &chip->desc[offset].flags); > u32 pin = offset + chip->base; > > I think the end result should be: > > bool set_mux = pctl->desc->irq_read_needs_mux && > gpiochip_line_is_irq(chip, offset); > u32 pin = offset + chip->base; Yeah, that's because the resulting tree failed to build so I undid the merge and merged yesterday's version of the gpio tree. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
