Hello Russell, On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 08:58:18AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:17:50AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:07:55PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:55:01PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > > > So the unexpected abnormality here is that even though this device is > > > > instantiated by dt, the driver doesn't provide any compatibles. > > > > Either my expectation is wrong, then 67d02a1bbb33455 should be reverted > > > > > > Your expectation is wrong. AMBA primecell devices have hardware IDs > > > and are matched to their drivers by those IDs. Just like PCI. > > > > pci devices don't appear in dt, do they? I don't see the connection > > between amba devices and platform devices, see my other mail in this > > thread for some more details. > > They both have hardware IDs, and they are both matched via those hardware > IDs. I changed platform_match which is about matching by dt compatible, acpi and/or device name. I don't see how this can affect an amba device given they match to a driver by a hardware id. > Your change has introduced a regression and is therefore wrong. I'd like to understand though why and how my commit is wrong to be able to fix it instead of getting it reverted. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
