Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, 09 Feb, at 03:50:24PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   1e82b9479070 ("x86/efi: Show actual ending addresses in efi_print_memmap")
> > 
> > from the tip tree and commit:
> > 
> >   e0532ef9f825 ("x86/efi: print size and base in binary units in efi_print_memmap")
> > 
> > from the akpm tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> > is required).
> 
> I think Andrew agreed to drop this patch from his tree,
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160122151100.GA3747@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

... and I tried to follow up on the original submission to still preserve this 
change, as it's no doubt useful to produce easier to read bootup messages.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux