On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 16:42 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the target-updates tree got conflicts in:
>
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iscsi_iser.h
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_initiator.c
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_memory.c
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/iser/iser_verbs.c
> drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c
>
> between commits:
>
> 4a061b287b1e ("IB/ulps: Avoid calling ib_query_device")
> cfeb91b375ad ("IB/iser: Convert to CQ abstraction")
> 2392a4cdcb8d ("IB/iser: constify iser_reg_ops structure")
> 422bd0acb062 ("IB/isert: Support the remote invalidation exception")
> 59caaed7a72a ("IB/iser: Support the remote invalidation exception")
>
> from the rdma tree and commit:
>
> ddca7d44ccd2 ("iser: Have initiator and target to share protocol structures and definitions")
> 6d2cb3ad4bc2 ("iser-target: Support the remote invalidation exception")
> c37c810bae45 ("IB/iser: Increment the rkey when registering and not when invalidating")
> 9a4a71456262 ("IB/iser: Support the remote invalidation exception")
>
> from the target-updates tree.
>
> I fixed it up (hopefully - mainly taking one of the other side (usually
> the rdma tree version, so please check the result when I release it)
> and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
>
> Seom of these patches are very similar ...
>
Thanks SFR.
Sagi & Or, to confirm the iser/iser-target changes currently queued in
Doug's rdma.git for-next branch means the -v2 series introducing
remote invalidation support here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg11289.html
can now be safely dropped from target-pending/for-next, yes..?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
