> On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:01:14AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: >> Part of the plan was that Doug's tree would be merged before >> Bruce's. But the above problem description looks like the >> maintainer trees were merged into linux-next in the other order. >> >> I'd like to make this simpler for everyone. Bruce, may I send >> my for-4.5 NFS/RDMA server patches to Doug with your Acked-by? >> That way, merge order won't matter. >> >> Doug, what is the URL for the branch I should rebase on? > > I'm not Doug, but all the recent for 4.5 work is in Dougs tree > at > > https://github.com/dledford/linux rdma/k.o/for-4.5 > > Bruce, can you ACK me local_dma_lkey patch as well which needs > the same treatment as Chuck's patches? I have some RDMA work > in that area planned for the nxt merge window, so it would be > really helpful to get it in for 4.5. Actually, one of Or's for-4.5 devattr patches doesn't appear to have the proper Ack's for the changes under net/sunrpc/xprtrdma either. -- Chuck Lever -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html