> On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Jan 4, 2016, at 2:36 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:53:20PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: >>> On 01/03/2016 08:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:30:22 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Doug, >>>>> >>>>> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in a quite a >>>>> few files between (mostly, I think) commit: >>>>> >>>>> 6c7b6d2d442c ("IB: merge struct ib_device_attr into struct ib_device") >>>>> >>>>> from the nfsd tree and various commits from the rdma tree. >>>>> >>>>> It would have taken me considerable time to fix the conflicts up, so I >>>>> have dropped teh rdma tree for today (just because it was merged second). >>>>> Please have a conversation and figure out how you are going to cooperate >>>>> and get these conflicts fixed e.g. set up a stable branch with Christoph's >>>>> commit (and any other conflicting commits) in it and merge that into >>>>> both trees. >>>> >>>> So, on further inspection, it appears that there is a series of commits >>>> in the rdma tree that does basically the same as that nfsd tree commit >>>> above. So I have dropped the rdma tree again today. Please have a >>>> conversation guys ... >>>> >>> >>> The initial patchset was Christoph's. It was later replaced with a >>> different patchset from Or Gerlitz. Bruce picked up some changes from >>> Chuck Lever that were originally based on Christoph's work but now need >>> to be rebased off of the current RDMA tree. >> >> OK. I'm assuming Chuck will want to do any necessary rebasing and >> retesting himself, so for now I've just dropped those patches, and >> expect to pick up new versions when Chuck gets back from the holidays. > > Part of the plan was that Doug's tree would be merged before > Bruce's. But the above problem description looks like the > maintainer trees were merged into linux-next in the other order. > > I'd like to make this simpler for everyone. Bruce, may I send > my for-4.5 NFS/RDMA server patches to Doug with your Acked-by? > That way, merge order won't matter. Also, I see Dan Carpenter has posted a couple of clean-ups for this series. I can include them with my upcoming repost if you wish. -- Chuck Lever -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html