Hi Arnd,
On mer., déc. 02 2015, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 December 2015 11:18:29 Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:12:44AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Today's linux-next merge of the mvebu tree got a conflict in between commit
>> > 377524dc4d77f50e ("ARM: mmp: move into ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM") from the arm-soc
>> > tree and commit 5f4423af9dd17 ("ARM: orion: multiplatform support") from the
>> > mvebu tree.
>>
>> Ccing in Arnd since I forgot to do that.
>>
>
> I was planning to merge all the multiplatform changes into one next/multiplatform
> branch, but the mvebu maintainers preferred to keep this one in their
> tree at
Indeed except the arch/arm/Kconfig file all the other files belong to
the mbebu subsystem and it is easier to to keep in our tree to handle them.
> least initially. The conflict will go away once it's tested sufficiently and
> I'm pulling it back.
By the way, when you will pull our tree, we will still have it our own
mvebu/for-next branch. Will git managed to automagically resolve the
conflict by getting the resolution you will do in your branch?
A another solution could be to have a separate patch for the
arch/arm/Kconfig file that you keep in arm-soc.
Grégory
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
