On Thursday 15 October 2015 14:51:42 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 03:35:42 +0000 "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So should I ask Linus to apply this fix once merge window opens or you will send > > this, how do we go about fixing this one > > > > Or should I merge the above commit from asm-generic tree? > > Up to you. Though you should only merge fro mthe asm-generic tree if > the maintainer guarantees it will not be rebased. > > You could just wait and tell Linus that this fixup is needed when the > two trees are merged. It really need to go into the merge commit to > avoid bisection problems. > I've added a workaround to the asm-generic tree, no need to worry about it for now. We can change over the remaining users of asm-generic/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h for the following merge window and then remove the wrapper. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
