Hi Andrew, Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got conflicts in: mm/failslab.c mm/page_alloc.c between commit: 621a5f7ad9cd ("debugfs: Pass bool pointer to debugfs_create_bool()") from the driver-core tree and commit: 67c145d9ff18 ("mm, page_alloc: rename __GFP_WAIT to __GFP_RECLAIM") from the akpm-current tree. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx diff --cc mm/failslab.c index 98fb490311eb,35c876c82b9d..000000000000 --- a/mm/failslab.c +++ b/mm/failslab.c @@@ -3,12 -3,12 +3,12 @@@ static struct { struct fault_attr attr; - bool ignore_gfp_wait; - u32 ignore_gfp_reclaim; - int cache_filter; ++ bool ignore_gfp_reclaim; + bool cache_filter; } failslab = { .attr = FAULT_ATTR_INITIALIZER, - .ignore_gfp_wait = true, - .ignore_gfp_reclaim = 1, - .cache_filter = 0, ++ .ignore_gfp_reclaim = true, + .cache_filter = false, }; bool should_failslab(size_t size, gfp_t gfpflags, unsigned long cache_flags) diff --cc mm/page_alloc.c index 805bbad2e24e,c73913648357..000000000000 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@@ -2159,13 -2277,13 +2277,13 @@@ failed static struct { struct fault_attr attr; - u32 ignore_gfp_highmem; - u32 ignore_gfp_reclaim; + bool ignore_gfp_highmem; - bool ignore_gfp_wait; ++ bool ignore_gfp_reclaim; u32 min_order; } fail_page_alloc = { .attr = FAULT_ATTR_INITIALIZER, - .ignore_gfp_wait = true, - .ignore_gfp_reclaim = 1, - .ignore_gfp_highmem = 1, ++ .ignore_gfp_reclaim = true, + .ignore_gfp_highmem = true, .min_order = 1, }; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html