Hi Gustavo, On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:14:28 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I applied the patches that Andrew has had in his post merge series > (but I think you were sent a rolled up version): Actually it was sent by Alexander to Marcel: From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx> To: marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefan Schmidt <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [PATCH bluetooth-next] drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c: seq_printf() now returns NULL Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:23:30 +0200 Message-Id: <1441963410-24844-1-git-send-email-alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.1 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I will shortly be sending http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fs-seq_file-convert-int-seq_vprint-seq_printf-etc-returns-to-void.patch to Linus. This will cause the linux-next version of drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c to break at compilation time. Below is the fix. I suggest you apply this immediately. Otherwise I'll try to remember to send this in after Alexander's 890acf8330cac is merged. But there will be a window during which the build fails, and we'll get emails... From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c: seq_printf() now returns NULL Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c | 35 ++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c index b8b0628..9756e64 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c @@ -1645,32 +1645,17 @@ static struct dentry *at86rf230_debugfs_root; static int at86rf230_stats_show(struct seq_file *file, void *offset) { struct at86rf230_local *lp = file->private; - int ret; - - ret = seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS:\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.success); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - - ret = seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS_DATA_PENDING:\t%8llu\n", - lp->trac.success_data_pending); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - - ret = seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS_WAIT_FOR_ACK:\t%8llu\n", - lp->trac.success_wait_for_ack); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - - ret = seq_printf(file, "CHANNEL_ACCESS_FAILURE:\t%8llu\n", - lp->trac.channel_access_failure); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - ret = seq_printf(file, "NO_ACK:\t\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.no_ack); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - - return seq_printf(file, "INVALID:\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.invalid); + seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS:\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.success); + seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS_DATA_PENDING:\t%8llu\n", + lp->trac.success_data_pending); + seq_printf(file, "SUCCESS_WAIT_FOR_ACK:\t%8llu\n", + lp->trac.success_wait_for_ack); + seq_printf(file, "CHANNEL_ACCESS_FAILURE:\t%8llu\n", + lp->trac.channel_access_failure); + seq_printf(file, "NO_ACK:\t\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.no_ack); + seq_printf(file, "INVALID:\t\t%8llu\n", lp->trac.invalid); + return 0; } static int at86rf230_stats_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) -- 2.5.1 -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
