On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:24 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:26:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Vinod,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the slave-dma tree got conflicts in:
>>
>> drivers/dma/Kconfig
>> drivers/dma/Makefile
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 667dfed98615 ("dmaengine: add a driver for Intel integrated DMA 64-bit")
>>
>> from the pm, mfd and rtc trees and commits:
>>
>> 3c21619077be ("dmaengine: sort the Kconfig")
>> 7e97229b3920 ("dmaengine: sort the makefile")
>>
>> from the slave-dma tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>> is required).
>
> Thanks Stephen,
>
> I looked at this and merge is sorted, so looks good to me
Sorted by Kconfig symbol or by name?
IDMA64 sorts before IMG_MDC_DMA,
but "Intel integrated DMA 64-bit support" doesn't.
Most other Intel DMA drivers have an INTEL_ prefix.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
