On 08/03, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Sorry for the delay in replying, I was offline for a few days. Thanks > for fixing it up. I assume no need to apply this fix into arm-soc > for-next but please let me know if you prefer that. > Can we apply it into arm-soc. I'm worried we're going to forget about it, and having the include there in arm-soc (where a3314e9cf69c isn't present) doesn't hurt anything from what I can tell. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html