On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:35:52PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/linux/kexec.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 2b94ed245861 ("kexec: define kexec_in_progress in !CONFIG_KEXEC case")
>
> from the char-misc tree and commit:
>
> 3d86985f695b ("kexec: split kexec_load syscall from kexec core code")
>
> from the akpm-current tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> diff --cc include/linux/kexec.h
> index b63218f68c4b,5f193d80a6fb..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@@ -323,8 -325,7 +325,8 @@@ struct pt_regs
> struct task_struct;
> static inline void crash_kexec(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
> static inline int kexec_should_crash(struct task_struct *p) { return 0; }
> +#define kexec_in_progress false
> - #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC */
> + #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE */
>
> #endif /* !defined(__ASSEBMLY__) */
Looks good to me, thanks.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
