Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Eric,

On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:36:59 -0400 Eric B Munson <emunson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 16 Jul
> > 2015 14:58:53 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] mm: mlock: fix for add new
> > mlock, munlock, and munlockall system calls
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- 
> > arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h | 2 +- arch/arm/kernel/calls.S
> > | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h
> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h index 32640c431a08..2516c09d65d7
> > 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h +++
> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/unistd.h @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ * This may need
> > to be greater than __NR_last_syscall+1 in order to * account for
> > the padding in the syscall table */ -#define __NR_syscalls  (388) 
> > +#define __NR_syscalls  (392)
> 
> IIUC, this should be 391.

Read the comment above - it has to be 392 for padding.  (I actually
tried 391 and it fails to build.)

BTW, what mail client are you using - it really made a mess :-(

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux