Re: [PATCH] regulators: Add missing dummy definition for regulator_list_voltage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/07/15 13:38, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:06:50PM +0100, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:

+static inline int regulator_list_voltage(struct regulator *regulator, unsigned selector)
+{
+	return 0;
+}

I'd expect this stub to return -EINVAL since the voltage count should be
zero for !REGULATOR (since we obviously can't count the number of
voltages).

You are right, -EINVAL suites better. There are some users of the
API who consider 0 as invalid, but -EINVAL sounds better and covers
all the existing uses. Will resend the patch.

Thanks
Suzuki

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux