Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Paolo,

On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 09:49:09 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 06/07/2015 02:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> > kernel/sched/core.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> > 2ecd9d29abb1 ("sched, preempt_notifier: separate notifier
> > registration from static_key inc/dec")
> > 
> > from Linus' tree and commit:
> > 
> > 6efde1d3716b ("sched/preempt, kvm: Fix KVM preempt_notifier
> > usage")
> > 
> > from the tip tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (maybe - see below) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary (no action is required).
> 
> The commit from the tip tree is obsolete.

And has now been removed from the tip tree, so we won't see that
conflict today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpvsd67MDq2Q.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux