Hi Dan, On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:57:06 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:18:44 -0400 Dan Streetman <ddstreet@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > After merging the modules tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > that's weird. Are you sure it failed during allmodconfig? I can see > > why it would fail like that if CONFIG_MODULES ins't defined, which > > I'll send a patch for... > > Pretty sure - and, in any case, I don't do any CONFIG_MODULES=n builds > between tree merges (only later in the day). That is why I couldn't > figure out what went wrong. > > I will apply your patch today and see if that helps. I built without your patch and it failed again, but applying your patch fixes it. Rusty, you can consider this Tested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for "[PATCH] modules: only use mod->param_lock if CONFIG_MODULES" -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpchcusZpv1t.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
