Am Dienstag, 23. Juni 2015, 17:21:06 schrieb Herbert Xu: Hi Herbert, >On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:17:23AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> I get that too with m68k-linux-gcc-4.6.3 and m68k-linux-gcc-4.9.0. >> >> With m68k-linux-gnu-gcc-4.1, which is still my default cross-compiler due >> to the good unused warning reporting, I get: >> >> crypto/jitterentropy.c:235: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC push_options >> crypto/jitterentropy.c:236: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC optimize >> crypto/jitterentropy.c:266: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC pop_options >> crypto/jitterentropy.c:295: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC push_options >> crypto/jitterentropy.c:296: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC optimize >> crypto/jitterentropy.c:336: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC pop_options >> crypto/jitterentropy.c:385: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC push_options >> crypto/jitterentropy.c:386: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC optimize >> crypto/jitterentropy.c:416: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC pop_options >> crypto/jitterentropy.c:517: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC push_options >> crypto/jitterentropy.c:518: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC optimize >> crypto/jitterentropy.c:580: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC pop_options > >Stephan, could you look into moving the relevant functions into >its own file which can then be compiled with -O0? Obviously any >dependency on kernel header files would have to be hidden using >functions outside of this file. I will look into it. Thanks Ciao Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
