On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:56:04AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:25:07PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> > > include/linux/rcupdate.h between commits 0a04b0166929 ("rcu: Move
> > > lockless_dereference() out of rcupdate.h") from the modules tree and
> > > c1ad348b452a ("tick: Nohz: Rework next timer evaluation") from the tip
> > > tree and commits 7d0ae8086b82 ("rcu: Convert ACCESS_ONCE() to
> > > READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE()") and 3382adbc1bb8 ("rcu: Eliminate a few
> > > CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL #ifdefs") from the rcu tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> > > is required).
> >
> > Thank you, Stephen!
> >
> > Ingo, I can send you a pull request as is or I can merge c1ad348b452a
> > with v4.1-rc3, rebase my commits on top of that, and do another cycle
> > through -next. If I don't hear otherwise, I will be lazy and send as is,
> > so if you would prefer something different, please let me know.
>
> I think as-is would be better, to not create extra dependencies. I can resolve
> conflicts in -tip.
Very good! I expect to send the pull request tomorrow (Saturday)
Pacific time.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
