Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:25:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 20 May 2015 05:41:46 +0100 (IST) Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> > > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>> > >
>> > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c: In function 'create_queue_cpsch':
>> > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c:888:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'init_sdma_vm' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> > >   init_sdma_vm(dqm, q, qpd);
>> > >   ^
>> > >
>> > > Caused by commit 3e3f6e1a90a8 ("drm/amdkfd: make the sdma vm init to be
>> > > asic specific").
>> > >
>> > > I have used the drm tree from next-20150519 for today.
>> >
>> > Okay this looks like a silent conflict, I'll have to pull Linus tree into
>> > drm-next and fix it up there.
>>
>> Yep, against commit 79b066bd76d5 ("drm/amdkfd: Initialize sdma vm when
>> creating sdma queue") which is in v4.1-rc3.
>
> So you could, of course, just merge that commit instead of Linus'
> tree ...
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,
Did I need to do something different in order to prevent this conflict ?
Do some manual merge before sending the pull request ?

Thanks,
          Oded
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux