On Wed, 13 May 2015, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 15:51 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:34:48PM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > arm64-allmodconfig > > > ../drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c:924:3: error: implicit declaration of function '__hrtimer_start_range_ns' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > > > > arm-allmodconfig > > > ../drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c:924:3: error: implicit declaration of function '__hrtimer_start_range_ns' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > > Today's -next fails to build both arm and arm64 allmodconfig due to the > > above errors, introduced in commit ffa415245b8666c44d (bus: arm-ccn: > > cpumask attribute). Judging from the name of the symbol it appears that > > the code is peering into hrtimer implementation details and indeed it > > was removed in commit 58f1f803f1d6ef9 (hrtimer: Get rid of > > __hrtimer_start_range_ns()) which has a commit message suggsting that > > this has indeed been explicitly removed and no new references should be > > added. > > Right, the fix will be equivalent to > 576b0704c9def6d54b3ae9e13b0b7567c713f568 "x86: perf: uncore: Use > hrtimer_start()" > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142904610220085 > > Will post it in a second, but not sure who should take it? The arm-soc > guys, as an additional ccn patch, or Thomas as part of his series? Route it through the same tree as the commit which introduces the __hrtimer_start_range_ns usage Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
