On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:36:03PM +0200, Quentin Casasnovas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 09:11:14AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 06:42:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: [ ... ] > > It is rude and I'm really sorry about this, I had only tested this on > x86_64 and sparc. > > Should I send a tentative fix or will you do it since you've done all the > hard work? In any case thanks for the detailed analysis. > Hi Quentin, I don't really know what to cast the pointers to, given they have different real types (and maybe you should not even pass the pointers in the first place but do that test in the calling code), so I'll leave the fixing up to you. If you Cc: me on the fix, I can test it for the affected architectures (score, mn10300, parisc, parisc64). Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
