On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:17:44AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > > Is the assumption of this patch wrong? Does the specified node have > > to be online for the fallback to work? > > Nodes that are offline have no control structures allocated and thus > allocations will likely segfault when the address of the controls > structure for the node is accessed. > > If we wanted to prevent that then every allocation would have to add a > check to see if the nodes are online which would impact performance. Okay, that makes sense, thank you. Andrew, can you please drop this patch? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
