Re: Fwd: linux-next: manual merge of the luto-misc tree with the tip tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > * Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ingo and Thomas-
> >>
> >> There's a trivial conflict in the pull request I sent last week.
> >
> > This is your x86 entry code rework pull request, right? The -tip
> > tree now has the RCU commit it depends on, so could you please
> > rebase it on top of tip:core/rcu so I can pull it? I'll resolve
> > any remaining conflicts with the rest of -tip.
> >
> 
> Sure, I can do that in the morning.  The pull request merges cleanly
> with tip:core/rcu, though, so is the rebase needed?

Yes, because your changes rely on the RCU change (semantically), 
so if anyone bisects into your commits it might result in a 
subtly broken kernel, right?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux