On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:41:58 +0100 (CET) Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Instead, make live kernel patching fail to load if fentry isn't > > supported. IOW, instead of ftrace_ipmodify_supported, have a > > live_kernel_patching_supported that could be based on fentry being used > > or not. > > I can live with that, we are handling non-fentry case ourselves already. > > You expressed that you would accept such patch for ftrace in a past, so I Right, but then I thought about it more :-) I had a lot of time thinking about things like this while debugging the dance between function graph and jprobes. > thought I'll move it out from livepatching to ftrace. But if you don't > want it now, that's not a big issue, and handling the possible fallout > stays the responsibility of ftrace_ops "owner". > Exactly! -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
