On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Hmm, if this binary doesn't support IPMODIFY, it should return -ENOTSUPP. Good poing, will send v3. > And also, IMHO, we'd better reject registering ftrace_ops with IPMODIFY > in this situation before updating hash table. That would happen automatically if we return -ENOTSUPP, right? Because the check in ftrace_hash_move() would cause freeing of the new_hash and the error value would get propagated out to ftrace_hash_move() callers. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html