Hi Andy, On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 23:26:36 -0800 Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2014 10:58 PM, "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The luto-misc tree seems to have a whole series of commits in it that > > have just bee removed from the rcu tree ... You really have to be very > > careful if you base your work on a tree that is regularly rebased. > > Hmm. They were there a couple days ago. Paul, what should I do about > this? I only need the one NMI nesting change for the stuff in > luto/next. One of them was causing a problem and (I think) the rest were for v3.20 and so Paul reset his tree. > > I also wonder if the other commits in that tree are destined for > > v3.19? If they are for v3.20, then they should not be in linux-next > > until after v3.19-rc1 has been released. > > They're for 3.20. I'll drop the whole series from the next branch for now. Thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpI9lxm2h4YF.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
