On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 02:48:17PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > After merging the slave-dma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: I did merge the next-20141208 wth this new code and pushed. Found and resolved the same merg conflict as you :) Feng'd bot didn't find any issues, so am wondering why :) Neverthless, I am dropping these changes from next. Thanks for reporting them > drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c: In function 'atmel_spi_stop_dma': > drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c:485:26: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'device_control' > as->dma.chan_rx->device->device_control(as->dma.chan_rx, > ^ > drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c:486:8: error: 'DMA_TERMINATE_ALL' undeclared (first use in this function) > DMA_TERMINATE_ALL, 0); > ^ > drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c:486:8: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c:488:26: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'device_control' > as->dma.chan_tx->device->device_control(as->dma.chan_tx, > ^ > drivers/usb/musb/ux500_dma.c: In function 'ux500_configure_channel': > drivers/usb/musb/ux500_dma.c:124:18: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'device_control' > dma_chan->device->device_control(dma_chan, DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG, > ^ > drivers/usb/musb/ux500_dma.c:124:45: error: 'DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG' undeclared (first use in this function) > dma_chan->device->device_control(dma_chan, DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG, > ^ > drivers/usb/musb/ux500_dma.c:124:45: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > drivers/usb/musb/ux500_dma.c: In function 'ux500_dma_channel_abort': > drivers/usb/musb/ux500_dma.c:249:34: error: 'struct dma_device' has no member named 'device_control' > ux500_channel->dma_chan->device-> > ^ > drivers/usb/musb/ux500_dma.c:251:6: error: 'DMA_TERMINATE_ALL' undeclared (first use in this function) > DMA_TERMINATE_ALL, 0); > ^ > > Caused by commit f86999789afe ("dmaengine: Remove device_control and > device_slave_caps"). > > I have used the slave-dma tree from next-20141208 for today. -- ~Vinod
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature