On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:51:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:38:53 +0900 Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:31:32PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
> > > sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c between commit 2e4f75919e5a ("ASoC:
> > > Intel: Add PM support to HSW/BDW PCM driver") from the sound-asoc tree
> > > and commit 3c1af8802e45 ("ASoC: intel: drop owner assignment from
> > > platform_drivers") from the driver-core tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> > > is required).
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cheers,
> > > Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > diff --cc sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c
> > > index 7eb9afc9b33d,ad21e636edc6..000000000000
> > > --- a/sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c
> > > +++ b/sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c
> > > @@@ -1173,9 -899,6 +1173,8 @@@ static const struct dev_pm_ops hsw_pcm_
> > > static struct platform_driver hsw_pcm_driver = {
> > > .driver = {
> > > .name = "haswell-pcm-audio",
> > > - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > > + .pm = &hsw_pcm_pm,
> > > +
> > > },
> > >
> > > .probe = hsw_pcm_dev_probe,
> >
> >
> > Fix looks good, thanks.
>
> I assume that there was a good reason not to farm these patches out to
> their respective maintainers?
Yes, It was easier to hit everything in one tree, at one time, so that
is what Wolfram did. Sorry for the merge conflicts, I didn't think
anyone would be adding .driver attributes to files after they had been
added to the tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
