Hello,
On 2014-10-28 07:29, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:24:44 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in
mm/cma.c between commit 16195ddd4ebc ("mm: cma: Ensure that
reservations never cross the low/high mem boundary") from the
dma-mapping tree and commit 2a70e5a78672 ("mm/cma: ake kmemleak ignore
CMA regions") from the akpm-current tree.
hm, we have multiple trees altering mm/cma.c?
I'm a bit surprised that this series was merged, given that Laurent
said he would be sending out a v2...
v2 of Laurent's patches has been posted on 24th October
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/24/207 ), but since I didn't notice them
to be taken
I thought that it would make sense to get them via my tree and send them
to Linus
during the 3.18-rc cycle. If this was not appropriate, I will drop my tree.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
