On 07/30/2014 05:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> One obvious thing ...
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:01:05 -0700 John Stultz
<john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
>> index fd0158f..d15f48e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.c
>> @@ -1731,19 +1731,14 @@ fail:
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> -u32 ath9k_hw_get_tsf_offset(struct timespec *last, struct timespec *cur)
>> +u32 ath9k_hw_get_tsf_offset(ktime_t *last, ktime_t *cur)
>> {
>> - struct timespec ts;
>> s64 usec;
>>
>> - if (!cur) {
>> - getrawmonotonic(&ts);
>> - cur = &ts;
>> - }
>> -
>> - usec = cur->tv_sec * 1000000ULL + cur->tv_nsec / 1000;
>> - usec -= last->tv_sec * 1000000ULL + last->tv_nsec / 1000;
>> + if (!cur)
>> + *cur = ktime_get_raw();
>
> You are assigning through a NULL pointer here ...
Gah. That's embarrassing. Thank you. I'll fix that up.
thanks
john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
