Hi Nick, On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 21:16:16 -0400 Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 20:45:25 -0400 Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > >> > Status of my local build tests will be at > >> > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next . > > > >> I am trying to get the maintainers to clean up still failing builds. > >> When you get time I wondering > >> if you can send me a list of still failing builds and warnings of > >> interest in the kernel that is' > >> up to date for me to help clean up these outstanding issues with the > >> maintainers support as needed. > > > > See above ... > > There seems to be a few that are still succeeding for me that aren't for. > Would you mind testing some of them again to see if they are succeeding > with a gcc compiler that is newer then version 4.7. Please tell us exactly what you are testing: what kernel version, what compiler/binutils version. The kernel is meant to be able to be built with gcc 4.7 (and some earlier) - barring compiler bugs, of course. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
