Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stephan,

On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 22:01:46 +0200 Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> @@ -1987,8 +1987,9 @@ static int __init drbg_init(void)
>  
>  	if (ARRAY_SIZE(drbg_cores) * 2 > ARRAY_SIZE(drbg_algs)) {
>  		pr_info("DRBG: Cannot register all DRBG types"
> -			"(slots needed: %lu, slots available: %lu)\n",
> -			ARRAY_SIZE(drbg_cores) * 2, ARRAY_SIZE(drbg_algs));
> +			"(slots needed: %u, slots available: %u)\n",
> +			(unsigned int)ARRAY_SIZE(drbg_cores) * 2,
> +			(unsigned int)ARRAY_SIZE(drbg_algs));

Doesn't ARRAY_SIZE() always return a size_t?  In which case surely we
need no casts, but need to us %zu in the format string.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux