[Consult] About only one Signed-of-by for the patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Maintainers:

I find some of patches are only Signed-of-by me, are they OK?

e.g:

commit d7de15786d1a10fa18b80fd44026d442e7a84bd2
Author: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Apr 15 09:21:30 2014 +0800

    arch:unicore32:mm: add devmem_is_allowed() to support STRICT_DEVMEM
    
    unicore32 supports STRICT_DEVMEM, so it needs devmem_is_allowed(), like
    some of other architectures have done (e.g. arm, powerpc, x86 ...).
    
    The related error with allmodconfig:
    
        CC      drivers/char/mem.o
      drivers/char/mem.c: In function â<U+0080><U+0098>range_is_allowedâ<U+0080><U+0099>:
      drivers/char/mem.c:69: error: implicit declaration of function â<U+0080><U+0098>devmem_is_allowedâ<U+0080><U+0099>
      make[2]: *** [drivers/char/mem.o] Error 1
      make[1]: *** [drivers/char] Error 2
      make: *** [drivers] Error 2
    
    Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
    Acked-by: Xuetao Guan <gxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux