On 23/05/2014 at 09:19:41 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote :
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:24:23PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Thierry,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the pwm tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c between commit 5f7b03dc2ab5 ("leds: leds-pwm:
> > provide a common function to setup a single led-pwm device") from the
> > leds tree and commit 81225bed3273 ("leds: leds-pwm: retrieve configured
> > PWM period") from the pwm tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> > (no action is required).
>
> The resolution below looks good to me. Thanks!
>
> Alexandre, Bryan, as far as I can tell there are no dependencies between
> this patch and the rest of the series that Alexandre sent, so perhaps it
> would be a better idea to take this particular patch via Bryan's leds
> tree?
>
> Then again the resolution looks like something that Linus can reasonably
> handle, so maybe things are fine as-is.
>
I'm fine with either solution, tell me if you want me to rebase my
patch.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
